Mocirne's comments on Fugly
page 22
On Wednesday, November 11th 2009, in videos, Mocirne wrote:
Wow Cyd, I just picked one name at random (Catherine Tate), googled her, and I gotta say, the hideous face staring back at me is NOT one I would have chosen as an example. Although I'm not a fan of the ginger-people, so I'm probably biased on this one.
On Wednesday, November 11th 2009, in videos, Mocirne wrote:
I agree with that last statement 100%. Those talent agencies definitely look wayyyy past the rotting, purple-bluish teeth jutting out of their mouths at random, odd angles and provide the world with fine British entertainment such as a man dressing up in women's clothing and running around in tight circles in fast motion! I could laugh at that non-stop for hours! Oh, and Jocelyn was born in Europe, but even if she wasn't, that example still wouldn't have made sense since she was hot BEFORE she had her face mangled by plastic surgery.
On Tuesday, November 10th 2009, in videos, Mocirne wrote:
Lol @ that final moan of terror he gives in 0:49, then all you see are those two gargantuan cellulite-filled ass cheeks filling up the entire screen.
On Tuesday, November 10th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
You know the part in the movie where a group of people (usually with the hero of the movie present) is watching a video of something that looks normal, and suddenly one of them goes "Hey, what's that in the corner? Zoom in!", and the ominous music starts playing as the image gets zoomed in and slowly gets more focused until some incriminating piece of evidence appears, such as a piece of paper in someone's coat pocket? That's how I think conspiracists imagine themselves when they're watching 9/11 videos, as if THEY of all people are able to look past the lie and brilliantly deduce some overlooked, tiny detail.
On Monday, November 9th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
Yes, again, you and your ideas of cartoon physics. You say the laws of physics state a building that wasn't hit at all wouldn't fall down (which by the way is nothing new or special, and falls well within the realm of Loose Change-ish theories)? Of course that's true. What's funny is that you completely neglect to mention the combined 250-story collapse of the North and South tower which, perhaps, MIGHT affect the surrounding environment. The collapse of those two buildings was a little more than the "nothing" that hit building 7, eh? Yes, you'll say that's a cop-out, or I'm blindly believing the lie, and I of course could say the same about you. The only thing separating us is evidence, incontrovertible proof, something which no one on my side could possibly explain, and so far, everything you left-wing nutbags come up with is easily refuted. Lol @ "puffs of smoke coming out the windows = demolition".
On Monday, November 9th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
Well sure, collective in the sense that a few people together believe it, but there is also a "collective" group who believe the moon landing was staged in a warehouse, again defying all laws of optics and atmosphere-free phenomena. But yeah, I agree 9/11 conspiracy theories is a silly argument for Fugly, but until they add more yahoo chat victims page, it's an interesting diversion.
On Monday, November 9th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
Yes dummy... people need to find meaning in horrific acts, and they have throughout history. It astounds me that you would assign "God" or "money" to every recorded war... ever. Every single war, throughout human history, eh? Think about what you type before you actually type it. No, 9/11 was simply a terrorist act, a macrocosm of what happened at Fort Hood, yet we have this tiny minority (you included) who proclaims that "steel can't melt at the temperature required for jet fuel to burn", or "the plane didn't leave a perfect outline of itself in the Pentagon" or "Larry Silverstein himself said we're going to bring it down"; those laughable laws of physics that you pull straight out of Looney Tunes, that's why the vast majority of us regard you as simple-minded lunatic conspiracy theorists with way too much time on your hands.
On Monday, November 9th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
Well, belief in 9/11 conspiracies doesn't always come from a political left or right leaning "pendulum". It comes from the inherent human nature of wanting to find comfort in the following fact: that 9/11 was orchestrated and planned by our own government, and once the government has what it wants (war in Afghanistan and Iraq) the government would have no reason to attack us again. The truth, that it was planned and executed by a shadowy, spread-out group of global terrorists, is infinitely more frightening, and thus people are less likely to want to believe it.
On Monday, November 9th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
A bunch of morons buying into 9/11 conspiracy theories because some pimply-faced college retard produces a Youtube video about it is the "greater collective mind"? Every aspect of 9/11 conspiracy theories has been disproven by scientific fact and basic principles of engineering and physics, and yet you fools want to cling to your theories about oil or Jewish bankers to find some meaning and reason with what happened that day.
By the way, that picture is hilarious.
On Wednesday, June 17th 2009, in pictures, Mocirne wrote:
Lol, that was actually pretty funny.